Showing posts with label Germany. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Germany. Show all posts

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Book Review: German Diplomats Remember Kosovo

Book Review: German Diplomats Remember Kosovo

24 January 2008 For historians it is may still be too early to assess the Kosovo war, but German’s former foreign minister and a retired diplomat provide a valuable insight into Berlin’s role in the 20th century’s last war.

By Paul Hockenos

Diplomacy on the Edge: Containment of Ethnic Conflict and the Minorities Working Group of the Conferences on Yugoslavia, by Geert-Hinrich Ahrens (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2007, 672 pages.)

Die rot-grünen Jahren: Deutsche Aussenpolitik—vom Kosovo bis zum 11. September, by Joschka Fischer, (Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, pp. 444.)

Most of Ahrens's nearly 700-page account of international diplomacy in the Balkans takes place in the early and mid-1990s. Ahrens, a veteran German negotiator, led some of the earliest European efforts to bring together Kosovar Albanians and the Belgrade leadership.

Ahrens’s small mediation teams were able to make sporadic progress improving the situation on the ground in Kosovo — in human rights, education, and healthcare - and defusing tensions that could then easily have, and later did, spiral out of control.

Even though neither the Serbs nor the Kosovar Albanians budged from their maximalist positions on Kosovo's status, Ahrens shows that there was room for negotiation and compromise between moderate factions of both camps. At the very least, "containment" of the potential conflict was possible.

With considerable bitterness Ahrens underscores the thin political support from both the American and major European capitals, which, he argues, caused the international community to miss real chances to make progress. He says Kosovo was, at best, treated as a "side show", and after the 1995 Dayton conference, Kosovo disappeared completely from the international agenda.

As a result, in early 1996, the International Conference on Former Yugoslavia working group on Kosovo, which Ahrens had led, was scrapped for lack of funds. Shortly afterwards, the first Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) attacks began.

Red-Green and Kosova

Armed hostilities in Kosovo had already begun when the autumn 1998 elections in Germany ousted Helmut Kohl's conservative government. The Serbs had responded to KLA guerrilla activity with military offensives that targeted the civilian population. Tens of thousands of ethnic Albanian refugees were fleeing their homes, many of whom were homeless as winter approached. The incoming Social Democrat-Green coalition had the Kosovo crisis thrust upon it even before the administration entered office.

The Fischer memoirs cover the first three years of the red-green coalition, from autumn 1998 to September 11, 2001, a formative period for German foreign policy during which the novice leadership struggled with crises of major proportions. At least one-third of the book is about Kosovo (the section aptly titled "The Red-Green Nightmare"), and offers a fascinating look into the decision-making of the German leadership.

Ironically, in foreign affairs, the red-green years delivered anything but the "continuity" the German Greens and Social Democrats had promised beforehand. In fact, it was in Berlin’s Balkans policies that the contradictions between humanitarianism, Germany's historical limitations, and alliance responsibilities would sweep away the Cold War coordinates of German foreign policy.

Fischer responds explicitly to critics, many within his own party, who opposed the military campaign against Serbia. He repeatedly underscores that the purpose of the NATO-led military intervention was humanitarian: to "prevent another Bosnia", as he puts it. "Milosevic," concluded Fischer after visiting Belgrade in early 1999, "obviously wanted to break the Albanian resistance using military might, special police, terror, and expulsion." After having waited much too long to stop genocide in Bosnia, the West had no other choice.

Fischer contends that Germany and its Western allies did everything in their power to bring Milosevic to accept a political solution. At the Rambouillet negotiations in early 1999, the Serbs wasted their last chance to hold on to Kosovo.

Fischer rejects the charge that negotiators had "held the bar too high" for Serbia, making it impossible for them to sign, and thus triggering NATO’s military intervention. Annex B of the draft agreement, which would have given NATO full occupation powers in Yugoslavia, played no role at all in the Rambouillet negotiations, he asserts. It reflected NATO's maximalist negotiating position and would have been addressed after the signing of the agreement's political section, which never happened.

Another bone of contention was the January 1999 massacre by Serbian security forces in the village of Racak in Kosovo, which helped tip the scales in favour of intervention. According to Fischer, the report of Finnish medical specialists affirmed that the dead were overwhelmingly civilians who were shot at close range, not KLA fighters. Moreover, this was not an isolated incident, underlines Fischer, but part of a pattern, the purpose of which was to deprive the KLA of support by driving out the ethnic Albanians.

As for "Operation Horseshoe," an alleged Serbian plan to ethnically cleanse Kosovo, Fischer says he was told of the plan’s existence by the Bulgarian foreign minister on April 1, 1999. Its authenticity was subsequently confirmed by German intelligence services.

The mass expulsion of ethnic Albanians from Kosovo in spring 1999, argues Fischer, was obviously planned in advance, well before the beginning of NATO bombing. The exodus was triggered by the Serb offensive, which commenced four days before the first NATO bombs fell. In other words, atrocities were not “imminent,” they were ongoing.

Fischer has harsh words for the European left that protested against the bombing campaign but never lifted a finger for the Kosovar Albanians during their eight-year campaign of passive resistance. “The fate of the Kosovar Albanians did not seem to interest the radical left in Europe at all," he says.

Equally fascinating is Fischer’s blow-by-blow description of the emergence of the "Fischer Plan" (which he claims he had no role in naming). The peace plan set aside the Rambouillet conditions, and brought the UN and Russia back into the game, paving the way to end the war, which came none too soon for an ever shakier red-green coalition.

Memoirs, by their very nature, are one-sided, self-serving, and self-promoting. Fischer’s account will probably not convince anyone who did not already believe that the 1999 intervention in Kosovo was justified. But the historical record is now richer with these two publications, even if they are not the last word.

Paul Hockenos is an American, Berlin-based writer and author of Joschka Fischer and the Making of the Berlin Republic: An Alternative History of Postwar Germany (Oxford, 2008).
BalkanInsight.com - Book Review: German Diplomats Remember Kosovo

Blogged with Flock

Saturday, October 13, 2007

German peacekeepers could stay in independent Kosovo



Canada.com
Kosovo Teen Wants Family Back in Austria
The Associated Press - 9 hours ago
VIENNA, Austria (AP) - Clutching a teddy bear, a 15-year-old Kosovo girl who had threatened to kill herself unless her family was reunited in Austria pleaded Friday for the return of her deported father and four siblings.


German peacekeepers could stay in independent Kosovo
The Post - 11 hours ago
BERLIN: A senior German politician said Berlin could keep its peacekeepers in Kosovo if the Serbian province unilaterally declared itself a sovereign state.


Business: Kosovo takes steps to join WTO
Southeast European Times - 18 hours ago
Kosovo's institutions have made a decision to begin talks on eventual WTO membership. Also this week: Fortune magazine débuts in Turkey.


Albania, Croatia, Macedonia get vote of confidence
Southeast European Times - 18 hours ago
The NATO Parliamentary Assembly adopted a resolution calling on the Alliance to launch membership talks with Albania, Macedonia and Croatia in 2008, provided the necessary conditions have been met.


PR-Inside.com (Pressemitteilung)
Serbia puts up €1m reward for the capture of General Mladic
Independent - 10 hours ago
By Vesna Peric Zimonjic in Belgrade Serbia has put up a reward of €1m (£700000) for information leading to the arrest of the Bosnian Serb fugitive General Ratko Mladic.


Slovenia finds its way
Seattle Times - Oct 10, 2007
The country is Slovenia, whose population is not much greater than King County's. Slovenia declared independence from Yugoslavia in 1991, thereby separating itself from the Bosnian war.

Blogged with Flock

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Kosovo's moment

Kosovo's moment

PRISTINA, Kosovo: This is a critical time for the Balkans: Serbia holds parliamentary elections on Sunday as Kosovo anxiously awaits a final report on the future status of the disputed province by the UN special envoy, Martti Ahtisaari.

We expect Ahtisaari to deny Serbia's demand to grant Kosovo broad autonomy within Serbian borders, and to endorse its bid for independence.

We need an independent Kosovo and a democratic Serbia. The European Union, now under German stewardship, can help by ensuring a common EU position in support of independence.

An independent Kosovo would benefit the region economically, politically and in terms of security. A decision on its status is long overdue, and as a result local frustrations are on the rise while the region continues to stagnate.

We need a new dynamic if we are to catch up with the EU. An independent Kosovo can provide that dynamic. Only the people of Kosovo — ethnic Albanians, Serbs and other minorities working together — can ensure that the province undergoes a successful transition.

A stable and prosperous Kosovo means a stable and prosperous region. Kosovo has a sound macroeconomic system, a broad tax base and a modern legislative system that protects private property and investors. Our labor laws are flexible. Kosovo has one of the simplest mechanisms for registering a company in the region. The government is currently overseeing a $2.3 billion coal energy development project — Kosovo has the fifth largest reserves of coal in the world.

Kosovo has changed in fundamental ways since NATO forces defeated Slobodan Milosevic's army in 1999 and a UN mission came to administer the province. Standards of living and personal freedom have improved, and we are working to give practical underpinnings to our reassurance to our minority citizens that the process of transition in Kosovo is for the good of us all.

We are ensuring that our Serb minority will live in municipalities where the police, schools and hospitals will be run by Serbs. We recognize Serbian as one of the official languages of Kosovo, and we further guarantee representation to our minorities in the government.

The future of the Kosovo Serbs is in Kosovo, and Kosovo's future is with its Serbs. We will succeed if we manage to preserve the multiethnic character of Kosovo. Those who misguidedly advocate partition, ignoring the fact that most of our Serbs are spread across Kosovo, are trying to challenge this future as well as call into question the territorial integrity of Bosnia and Macedonia.

We understand the stakes. Independence is above all a responsibility — a responsibility toward our citizens and the region. Independence is a beginning. Kosovo must develop a sustainable economy and we must improve our security capabilities. We can do both if we invest now in our young population so as to ensure their competitive edge in a globalized economy.

Kosovo is committed to a European future, but we have no illusions. We know that the European perspective for Kosovo is a work in progress. But I firmly believe that the whole region will move faster once Kosovo's independence is recognized; this includes Serbia, which would move relatively quickly toward the EU if it were free of the Kosovo issue.

We have two Serbias today. One is modern and economically progressive, open-minded about Kosovo, and has its compass set on the EU. The other Serbia is obsessed with Kosovo and stifled by backward-looking nationalist thinking.

The election Sunday in Serbia is about Europe and the future. Serbia does not need Kosovo in order to move to Europe. In fact, Serbia risks losing both Kosovo and its European perspective if voters on Sunday elect radicals and nationalist politicians. The illusion that Kosovo will again be part of Serbia is better left aside.

International law bestows upon states both rights and responsibilities. It is the responsibility of a government to protect its citizens and accord them equal rights. Serbia has failed to do so.

Europe will play a key role in coming months as the discussion on the final status of Kosovo moves to the UN Security Council. European consensus on Kosovo's final status will help ensure that we soon have a UN mandate, which would be a preferred solution.

As the leader of the EU, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany can use her moral authority and Germany's political clout to build a European consensus backing Kosovo's independence.

Success in Kosovo would remind the world of the potential of the United Nations and of NATO to work for international peace. It would bolster international and national confidence in their continued relevance.

I firmly believe that both institutions have played a crucial role in Kosovo's transformation. It would be truly unfortunate to undermine all these years of hard work and progress by losing the political will to move to the logical next stage — the recognition of an independent Kosovo.

This is Kosovo's moment, but we share it with the European Union. Strong leadership by the German presidency in overcoming division in Europe on Kosovo's final status will ensure that we seize this historic opportunity, pronounce Kosovo independent and begin a genuine regional push toward the EU.

Agim Ceku is the prime minister of Kosovo.

Kosovo's moment - International Herald Tribune